There has been a lot of clamoring lately about why on earth there hasn't been another Contract With America. Well being the good sort of fellow that I am, I decided to take the initiative and write my own. After it all passes, there would be a great deal of weeping, and wailing, people tearing out their own hair, people threatening to jump off buildings, and gnashing of teeth if it doesn't get repealed, all in Berkley California. So here is my message to them before it happens: Just do it already.
Operation Wetback II Maybe California wouldn't be in so much debt if they didn't give everything that they payed for to people that never did, and never will contribute into the system. So lets get rid of the parasites in our country. They broke the law, so we are just going to let them get away with it? Get them out of here! They steal jobs from the people that actually pay into the system. The hollow excuse is that they do jobs that we won't do, well when they work for an employer that doesn't pay minimum wage, that might explain why we aren't doing those jobs.
In order for operation Wetback II to be successful we need to secure our border. It is ridiculous for us to think that we are all safe asleep in our beds when we have over 2000 illegals coming across the border everyday. If they can do it, don't you think a terrorist could? or maybe use it as a way to get WMD's across? Just a thought. So I propose that we secure our border by placing two layers of fence with landmines in between them. Of course we must utilize razor ribbon and warning signs to make it obvious that we mean business. To supplement the border patrol National Guard troops will be used to help. Under this new plan, we will shoot on site any armed invaders, and for good measure, tattoo first time offenders with a serial number, and catapult them back over so that the tax payers don't have to pay for a plane ticket. Second time offenders will be sent to Cuba as repayment for the Murial fiasco. This is not "racism" this is law enforcement, if one of your loved ones was murdered and nothing done about it, you would be moaning for justice, and law enforcement, that's all we want; so shut up already. Anyone found to be employing, harboring, and/ or knowingly don't turn in these criminals will be prosecuted. The title: The Border Security Act. I think the title is pretty creative.
This is the only part of this post where this fits. Make English our national language. The current majority of us speak it. If you come here and want to function in society, you must learn to read, write, and speak English. If you want to be a citizen, you must prove proficiency with the English language. By not knowing it you are only limiting yourself, and making others despise you for being lazy and making things difficult for the rest. You left wherever you came from, for the American dream, you can learn blooming English.
The current tax code is thousands upon thousands of pages and growing. We constantly have people claiming that somebody isn't paying their fair share. Because of the complex monster, corrupt politicians use the tax code as a weapon to dispose of their enemies, look at Rush Limbaugh while he lived in New York, he was constantly audited year after year; yet they couldn't find anything but used it just to hassle him. We are burdened and to cover our own behinds have to pay money out of our pockets just to file taxes and make sure it is right and even, then with so many loop holes and random garbage they still might get you. This is ridiculous, so we repeal the 16th amendment, and ratify H.R. 25 S.296. I don't even need to think up a title because it already has one: The Fair Tax Act. With 49% of Americans not paying taxes and that means people like me, (an actual tax payer) are getting SCREWED!!!!!! To make matters worse, you have others that cheat on paying them, this eliminates it. Got questions? Read the book, or visit fairtax.org for details.
Did your parents ever tell you to be careful who your friends were? or wouldn't let you hang around with the "bad apples." Unless you grew up in Mayberry or your nickname was Beaver and you had an older brother named Wally and this never happened to you, either you had bad parents or were in fact yourself a "bad apple." The logic behind this is that their bad habits wear off on you and/or just plain guilt by association. To make my point I'll redirect my fire from a few other directions whilst they others sink in. As a parent, would you take parenting advice from a toddler, a child molester, or a negligent parent? If you were baking a cake, and it wasn't coming out right, would you continue to repeat the whole process in hopes that it would come out right? What happens if you just use hollow threats when it comes to discipline your child? They laugh at you and keep doing whatever it is that they aren't suppose to do. So why do we as a nation continue to participate in similar follies? The above mentioned scenarios happen everyday in a little joint project called the United Nations. In it are despots, tyrants, countries that sponsor terrorism, human rights violators, communists, and socialists. And of course there we are, betwixt all of the earth's scum. They can't run their countries, yet they try to tell us how to run ours? They try to promote peace through sanctions that are a joke and actually send us to wars to support their cause. You don't see France, China, Iran, Cuba and the like sending troops. American tax payers hard earned money goes into something that doesn't benefit them. Did the U.N. help us with Katrina? When has the U.N. done anything for us? If their sanctions actually worked then why do we still have wars? Our founding fathers warned us not to get involved with foreign conglomerates, but of course, who listened? Woodrow Wilson tried to get us involved with the League of Nations, and we didn't because we saw reason. That and it was his idea, and I don't think he had any good ones. Then we got into the U.N. after the second World War. We are a sovereign nation, we are not France, or Cuba, we are America, so why are we having Libya make laws for us? I have a sign on my wall that I look at everyday before I go to work it says "Si Vis Pacem Parabellum" If you wish for peace, prepare for war. With that thought alone we don't need any part of the U.N. Yet we continue to bankroll the farce. So with the Enact National Sovereignty Act we contribute nothing to the U.N., no troops, no funds, yet we remain members so as to observe our enemies.
Grace Commission II In 1982 Ronald Reagan (God Bless you man!) created the Grace Commission to work like tireless bloodhounds. Here are their findings. "We came up with 2,478 separate, distinct, and specific recommendations..... For practical purposes, these savings, if fully implemented, could virtually eliminate the reported deficit by the 1990's versus an alternative deficit of $10.2 trillion in the decade of the 1990's if no action is taken.
"Equally important, the 2,478 cost cutting, revenue enhancing recommendations we have made can be achieved without raising taxes, without weakening America's needed defense build up, and without in any way harming necessary social welfare programs. 'Nuff said!
Yet what I find mind boggling is that congress didn't approve any of this, and there were enough S.O.B.s running around come election day to re-elect this mental degenerates. Thanks dummies.
Through the Harvesting America's Resources Act, we allow drilling much closer to shore for oil, and natural gas. ANWR will be opened to drilling. We must depend on what is ours. We claim to care about the environment, so we don't drill yet we get oil from countries that couldn't care less about it. WHAT!? While doing so funding our enemies. Let's take what is ours, by Allah! Thus creating jobs, boosting the economy and lowering the price of gas. WOW! Truth be told Global Warming, Climate Change, whatever the current politically correct term is in for that at present is just proof that your I.Q. was found in the children's shoe department. Yet, eventually oil will run out, that is a simple truthful fact. So we must still look into other avenues to power America. With that said, as much as I hate to say it, we should look toward France. In 1977 Jimmy Carter whose brain are just peanut shells, made it illegal to recycle nuclear waste. Yet France has been doing so and can run their country for approximately fourteen years on the their waste. The U.S. currently has enough waste saved up that if used could run every American home for twelve years. The resulting amount of nuclear waste that we couldn't use after that is very insignificant. So what are we waiting for? So to top it off we will pass The Declaration of Energy Independence , so that by 2030 we are no longer depending on people that still wipe their butts with their bare hands for energy. No longer are we at their mercy.
The End of Political Corruption Act would first and foremost limit the amount of time that congress serve in office, allowing for a combined total of twelve years of serving in congress. That means two terms in the senate, six in the house, or one term in the senate and three in the house. Our founding fathers never intended for it to be a career, yet its happening. They are so concerned with getting re-elected that they forget about their actual job and waste valuable time trying to get another two or six years to tack on to their past fifty years of wasteful spending. So that they may concentrate on serving us instead of trying to stay in business we put a limit on the time they can be in. The president has to do it,(not in honor of FDR, like they tell you, but rather because he was an oxygen thief and tried to run us into the ground) so why can't they? Thus brings me to my next point, earmark spending, pork barrel, by whatever name it is called, it is only a ploy used by politicians to get re-elected. Why would I in North Cackalacky, want to spend my money on a bridge in Pigs Knuckle Arkansas, that not only I will never use, but only two people will use. In 2006 congress approved $29 billion in earmarks. That's a waste. If it is needed so bad, that is what the state and local governments are for, not the federal. So to reinforce the fact, since they have a couple chances to get re-elected, this bill would prohibit earmark spending. Also, every bill that congress passes, will apply to them, they are supposed to be U.S. citizens too. This means that they pay into social security and such too. Have a nice day Nancy! Also, to prevent the whole you scratch my back I'll scratch yours, all campaign contributions must be sent to a national office were they will be redistributed to the person they are meant to go, without the politician ever knowing who it came from. That'll take the starch from the union's britches.
I could tack a few other of my ideas on, but baby steps will do for now. Once the positive effects of this are shown, we can enact more like closing the Department of Education and giving that back to the states. Slowly but surely, we can take back our country from the liberal, progressive menace that has been plaguing us for years. LONG LIVE RONALD REGAN!
Also I hope you'll join me and Ted Nugent and pray for good bombing weather. Have a nice day!
22 June 2010
20 June 2010
AHHHHH! Stupid People Are Everywhere!
The 19th century seems to abound with maligned and rather disturbing infantile theories that have now become revered ideologies into the 20th and 21st centuries despite the fact that they have been proven to be wrong. Darwin's theory of evolutionary thought that lead to eugenics and Hitler's quest to create a perfect race. Yet through my studies on the human body alone, there is no way, that by pure accident that we just happen to have an immune system, or sweat to cool off. It doesn't add up. This only lead me to confirm my belief that we were wonderfully made in God's image. Then we have Marx's and Engles pathetic notions, that they must of put as much thought into as I do about plopping yesterdays lunch into a porcelain chair. As per usual, I like to throw out the status quo, and engage in intellectual, almost philosophical conversations, (this kills time and stimulates the gray matter) on politics and religion. I was shocked by a police sergeant's closed minded, uneducated perspective on the grand scheme of things, claiming that trickle down economics is null and void, and clamoring on about how unions, that they "have it right." I spoke a piece on how unions are part of the cause of our current plague, and are in essence useless today. He said something about if a union worker heard me say that he'd hit me with a shovel. Thus ended the conversation, because we had to pull his truck out of the same hole that he got stuck in half an hour before. That should tell you something of the leftist, dare I say, intellect? So without further ado, what I wrote by chemlight:
There is no utopia, the thought itself is nothing but a pipe dream. You simply cannot achieve the perfection. But in lieu, you can do the next best thing. There is always a downfall in every system, so if common sense always prevailed, you'd choose the one with the least amount of faults. Now why do we even have money in the first place? To use it in exchange for something that we ourselves can't find or make. Now if you had no monetary limit, what would you buy? I'm not saying a happy marriage or something similar. The usual thing would be something like a Ferrari. Well if we were all equal financially speaking, either nobody would have it, or everyone would, which takes most of the fun from it, and is the least likely to occur. This in itself is incentive, if you want something you have to work hard for it. This means that you alone are responsible for your future. If you know that you have nothing to work towards, then you see that as you have no reason to work, and you just collect a wellfare check. Well, what happens when everyone begins to think like that, and nobody works? There would be no money, and nothing would ever get done. But by rewarding hard work, and moving up you make your own lot in life. So if you are a lazy worthless piece of garbage, you will die a lazy, worthless, piece of garbage. But, instead of sitting on your fat, blubbering posterior, you bust your hump day in and day out, never relenting, you stand a good chance of coming out on top. But, to do so, you need to realize, nothing in life is given to you. If it were so, there would be gumdrop mountains, rainbows sprouting out of Al Gore's ears, and Nancy Pelosi would be riding unicorns. The dull dreary thought of everyone being the same, it just sounds boring and repetitive, that cause there to be only one car company, one grocery shop, one TV channel. Dull. Lifeless. Like Janet Reno.
Now, if you made a substantially higher paycheck, would you sit on it, or spend more money? Well the above mentioned police sergeant's story was that Reaganomics doesn't work because the rich are all misers and live in caves on public land, eating roots and berries, while wearing fig leaves, or something like that. Well, to be honest, I for the half see the truth in what he was saying, but really, that just shows he never really thought beyond what he has, and what he wants.
If that were the case, why is there a market for caviar, Cadillacs, fur coats, fancy cigars, expensive wine, yachts, tailored suits, sports cars, and private jets? Now, without the wealthy, there would be no market for these, and millions of lost jobs. Well comrade if you want everyone to have a job you'll have a heck of a job creating more when you redistribute the wealth. So the whole thought that trickle down economics doesn't work is absurd, yet what is even more is Obama's trickle up quote. If you have money you will spend at least some of it, and if you have more, you will spend more. This might not always be the case, but I didn't say it was perfect, just that it was the best. So, by having more funds to spend, they will take that longer vacation, and get the leather seats in the car. Which all of these have more people involved in the process than you might think. Somebody has to raise the cow, somebody kills it, skins it, another tans the hide, somebody else cuts it to size and covers the actual seat. So by that one guy that had a little extra money in his pocket allowed more people to take home more money. That example alone missed numerous other people that profit from the entire ordeal. To top that off, those people that profited from it, get more money to spend on themselves and even more people get involved and exponentially everybody benefits. This is an elementary concept that people for whatever reason can't grasp! Why? It must be the curse of the department of educations meddling. Thanks Jimmy Carter! You were so good to us. (He might a good poster boy for a pro-choice campaign) Then again, common sense wouldn't prevail with the exception of a few.
My last job before coming to lovely Camp Swampy, was making guns for children. (The shame is I didn't make more.) We all liked working there, we could "organize" but we didn't want to. Why, you ask? Because the conditions were great, things were safe, we got paid well, etc. What we always dreaded was a visit from OSHA. Because, for starters, we were all grown adults, and if something wasn't safe, that was our own individual fault. Yet they would come by and say something about somebody not wearing safety glasses while running a CNC lathe that was completely in closed making there no reasonable need to wear glasses, unless it was secretly run by a nuclear reactor and we were bombed by Panamanian socialists. In that case I think safety glasses would be the least of our worries. My point is unions, aren't really needed, at all. For safety we have OSHA, the health department, all these inspectors out the wazoo. So Upton Sinclair can just stay dead, that was then this is now. There are so many regulations that really a union is only good for the "free" picnic. Another thought of mine that I'm just throwing out there for you to chew on is if unions protect the workers, why is there a Union of Union Representatives? That should speak for itself. A substantial number of people are threatened to join, (wait, who's protecting who from who now?) Yet in 60% of the elections to see if the company wants to join a union the vote passes, if they needed protection, don't you think the boss would try to stop them? The fact that they get mandatory pay raises would be in the words of Jackie Gleason "old fashion communism" that gives them no incentive to work harder. Another thought is of mine that I'm just throwing out out there is, if people are paying dues just for their collective bargaining, then how could SEIU ever afford to "contribute" $80 million smackers to candidates in the 2008 election? (Mostly Obama too) Truth is unions are about as crooked as a dogs hind leg, and about as useful as teats on a boar.They are very shady crooks.Read Arguing With Idiots by Glenn Beck, he does a much better job of explaining it than I do.But really, unions don't do anybody except the liberal politicians any good. Look at Chrysler, the union got almost all of the from the bailout package, why? Well if we follow the paper trail, their union paid millions into seeing Obama get elected. Oops! The cat rolled around in its own feces before being let out of the bag!
Unfortunately stupid people still exist, that's why things are how they are. But we can fix most of the problems, and pick up the slack of the Department of Education. Which brings me to my next post, unless something else comes up first. See you then.
There is no utopia, the thought itself is nothing but a pipe dream. You simply cannot achieve the perfection. But in lieu, you can do the next best thing. There is always a downfall in every system, so if common sense always prevailed, you'd choose the one with the least amount of faults. Now why do we even have money in the first place? To use it in exchange for something that we ourselves can't find or make. Now if you had no monetary limit, what would you buy? I'm not saying a happy marriage or something similar. The usual thing would be something like a Ferrari. Well if we were all equal financially speaking, either nobody would have it, or everyone would, which takes most of the fun from it, and is the least likely to occur. This in itself is incentive, if you want something you have to work hard for it. This means that you alone are responsible for your future. If you know that you have nothing to work towards, then you see that as you have no reason to work, and you just collect a wellfare check. Well, what happens when everyone begins to think like that, and nobody works? There would be no money, and nothing would ever get done. But by rewarding hard work, and moving up you make your own lot in life. So if you are a lazy worthless piece of garbage, you will die a lazy, worthless, piece of garbage. But, instead of sitting on your fat, blubbering posterior, you bust your hump day in and day out, never relenting, you stand a good chance of coming out on top. But, to do so, you need to realize, nothing in life is given to you. If it were so, there would be gumdrop mountains, rainbows sprouting out of Al Gore's ears, and Nancy Pelosi would be riding unicorns. The dull dreary thought of everyone being the same, it just sounds boring and repetitive, that cause there to be only one car company, one grocery shop, one TV channel. Dull. Lifeless. Like Janet Reno.
Now, if you made a substantially higher paycheck, would you sit on it, or spend more money? Well the above mentioned police sergeant's story was that Reaganomics doesn't work because the rich are all misers and live in caves on public land, eating roots and berries, while wearing fig leaves, or something like that. Well, to be honest, I for the half see the truth in what he was saying, but really, that just shows he never really thought beyond what he has, and what he wants.
If that were the case, why is there a market for caviar, Cadillacs, fur coats, fancy cigars, expensive wine, yachts, tailored suits, sports cars, and private jets? Now, without the wealthy, there would be no market for these, and millions of lost jobs. Well comrade if you want everyone to have a job you'll have a heck of a job creating more when you redistribute the wealth. So the whole thought that trickle down economics doesn't work is absurd, yet what is even more is Obama's trickle up quote. If you have money you will spend at least some of it, and if you have more, you will spend more. This might not always be the case, but I didn't say it was perfect, just that it was the best. So, by having more funds to spend, they will take that longer vacation, and get the leather seats in the car. Which all of these have more people involved in the process than you might think. Somebody has to raise the cow, somebody kills it, skins it, another tans the hide, somebody else cuts it to size and covers the actual seat. So by that one guy that had a little extra money in his pocket allowed more people to take home more money. That example alone missed numerous other people that profit from the entire ordeal. To top that off, those people that profited from it, get more money to spend on themselves and even more people get involved and exponentially everybody benefits. This is an elementary concept that people for whatever reason can't grasp! Why? It must be the curse of the department of educations meddling. Thanks Jimmy Carter! You were so good to us. (He might a good poster boy for a pro-choice campaign) Then again, common sense wouldn't prevail with the exception of a few.
My last job before coming to lovely Camp Swampy, was making guns for children. (The shame is I didn't make more.) We all liked working there, we could "organize" but we didn't want to. Why, you ask? Because the conditions were great, things were safe, we got paid well, etc. What we always dreaded was a visit from OSHA. Because, for starters, we were all grown adults, and if something wasn't safe, that was our own individual fault. Yet they would come by and say something about somebody not wearing safety glasses while running a CNC lathe that was completely in closed making there no reasonable need to wear glasses, unless it was secretly run by a nuclear reactor and we were bombed by Panamanian socialists. In that case I think safety glasses would be the least of our worries. My point is unions, aren't really needed, at all. For safety we have OSHA, the health department, all these inspectors out the wazoo. So Upton Sinclair can just stay dead, that was then this is now. There are so many regulations that really a union is only good for the "free" picnic. Another thought of mine that I'm just throwing out there for you to chew on is if unions protect the workers, why is there a Union of Union Representatives? That should speak for itself. A substantial number of people are threatened to join, (wait, who's protecting who from who now?) Yet in 60% of the elections to see if the company wants to join a union the vote passes, if they needed protection, don't you think the boss would try to stop them? The fact that they get mandatory pay raises would be in the words of Jackie Gleason "old fashion communism" that gives them no incentive to work harder. Another thought is of mine that I'm just throwing out out there is, if people are paying dues just for their collective bargaining, then how could SEIU ever afford to "contribute" $80 million smackers to candidates in the 2008 election? (Mostly Obama too) Truth is unions are about as crooked as a dogs hind leg, and about as useful as teats on a boar.They are very shady crooks.Read Arguing With Idiots by Glenn Beck, he does a much better job of explaining it than I do.But really, unions don't do anybody except the liberal politicians any good. Look at Chrysler, the union got almost all of the from the bailout package, why? Well if we follow the paper trail, their union paid millions into seeing Obama get elected. Oops! The cat rolled around in its own feces before being let out of the bag!
Unfortunately stupid people still exist, that's why things are how they are. But we can fix most of the problems, and pick up the slack of the Department of Education. Which brings me to my next post, unless something else comes up first. See you then.
16 June 2010
Even Former Pinkos Get It, Why Can't America?
I just received this email and thought I should share, verbatim:
Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them.
This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president."
"The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
13 June 2010
Ignorance and the Liberal Agenda
Call him POTUS. Yes, strange as it seems, one of my coworkers has this etched onto his car as his license plate. It is an acronym for President of the United States. I think of this as a little presumptuous on his part, but that is his goal in life. Inevitably we got talking politics, and of the first things he wanted to know was where I stood. Of course I puffed my chest up and explained that I'm a God fearing, Reagan conservative. He just calmly stated that he was a republican. That is were the similarities end. His views tend to go against everything that the GOP stands for, hates the tea party movement, is for every thing that Obama does, and watches CNN. Last weekend at a BBQ for our mutual friends promotion, we got talking while sitting at the campfire. Eventually something that you just don't talk about was bound to come up, and of course it did. Some how the topic of abortion came up, he was somewhere in the middle on the issue, not a "butch" feminazi wading chest deep in unborn baby blood, but not someone who was against it. I tried to best explain my view on the subject when he made one comment that set me off. Not in a bad way, but it proved to me that the leftist mindset can't see beyond their noses. "You can't regulate morality."
Oh really? So I broke it down for him. What is one of the most heinous crimes that you go to jail for? Murder, right? So, what about the bands of cannibals that killed and ate WWII pilots in the Pacific? That was their religion, way of life, so what if that happened in America, they would go to jail and rightly so. Statutory rape is another one, in essence almost all laws are based on some form of morality. Like stealing, it happens all the time, and the people that do must think its alright to do it, (otherwise they wouldn't be doing it) so I think its safe to say that you can regulate morality because its been done for years. So with that said where does the moral basis for our American system of morals come from? Now what I'm about to type here is going to raise eyebrows and cause Nancy Pelosi and other assorted liberals to start calling their shrink and protesting naked in the streets. America was founded on Juedo-Christian principles. Now for those that don't know the truth are going to start saying something about the separation of church and state only because you heard someone else say it when they removed the Ten Commandments from the county courthouse. BUT! That's a very big but, (like Rosie O'donnell's) I would love for you to show me where in the constitution it says anything about that. The 1st amendment verbatim is as follows: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. That's it! Where is the separation stuff? Well its not there. All it says in regards to religion is that you can practice whatever you want, (that even allow those freaks in tight britches that cry and worship Satan to do their thing) and that there will be no national religion. Simple. I have read the rest and there ain't squat on it. There is nothing more to read into it. So what is wrong with the Ten Commandments in the courthouse?
A few years back, I was privy to a philosophical conversation, and later read the same belief in a novel, and to be honest I know that it is very true. I have my own personal beliefs on the matter, and regardless if yours differ or not, look at all the good that the christian church has done, besides giving little old ladies comfort and peace of mind, the charitable works are second to none. But ultimately the morals that it has established are the basis for an almost Utopian society. What is evil or offensive in "Thou shalt not kill"? Or love thy neighbor as thy self? Now of course the fact that it goes against current social norms, Thou shall not commit adultery, Thous shall not covet, but look at the problems that these 2 commandments if followed prevent. So why is it a supreme court decision to remove ten very sound, and in my mind common sense ideals from a public place?
It is all part of a plot to erode our morals, this works in numerous ways so that they can further manipulate us in their grand scheme of making us subject to big government. If you think about it, why else would abortion be such a big issue with them? The same reason that Obama gave millions to Philadelphia schools for Trojan Magnum condoms.Well, this is how I view the matter, and since part of job entails telling people to send their quarterback in with his helmet on, I take the higher road and tell them to keep their pants on. But, still I got of the preventive measures training for std's, in that we were told that one of the number one causes of condom failure is using magnum condoms. Because they are too big, they fall off or don't properly provide the barrier seal. Why are we wasting tax dollars on magnum condoms when the regular ones are made of the same elastic material and you can stretch them past your elbow without them breaking? Why are we even encouraging this behavior?
The logic behind this is that it creates illegitimate children. Think about the typical 17 year old boy, he has his entire life ahead of him and he doesn't want to waste his time on a family this early in life. So now you have a mother that must quit school to take care of the child, and what does she do? Collects welfare! What they are doing is creating dependence on the government at an early age. The mother then can't get a job because she has no high school diploma. If a child is raised in that environment, they think it is alright to do the same thing and suckle themselves from Miss Piggy. By allowing this to go on we are creating a never ending cycle. What is next?
"It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God, and the bible."- George Washington
Oh really? So I broke it down for him. What is one of the most heinous crimes that you go to jail for? Murder, right? So, what about the bands of cannibals that killed and ate WWII pilots in the Pacific? That was their religion, way of life, so what if that happened in America, they would go to jail and rightly so. Statutory rape is another one, in essence almost all laws are based on some form of morality. Like stealing, it happens all the time, and the people that do must think its alright to do it, (otherwise they wouldn't be doing it) so I think its safe to say that you can regulate morality because its been done for years. So with that said where does the moral basis for our American system of morals come from? Now what I'm about to type here is going to raise eyebrows and cause Nancy Pelosi and other assorted liberals to start calling their shrink and protesting naked in the streets. America was founded on Juedo-Christian principles. Now for those that don't know the truth are going to start saying something about the separation of church and state only because you heard someone else say it when they removed the Ten Commandments from the county courthouse. BUT! That's a very big but, (like Rosie O'donnell's) I would love for you to show me where in the constitution it says anything about that. The 1st amendment verbatim is as follows: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. That's it! Where is the separation stuff? Well its not there. All it says in regards to religion is that you can practice whatever you want, (that even allow those freaks in tight britches that cry and worship Satan to do their thing) and that there will be no national religion. Simple. I have read the rest and there ain't squat on it. There is nothing more to read into it. So what is wrong with the Ten Commandments in the courthouse?
A few years back, I was privy to a philosophical conversation, and later read the same belief in a novel, and to be honest I know that it is very true. I have my own personal beliefs on the matter, and regardless if yours differ or not, look at all the good that the christian church has done, besides giving little old ladies comfort and peace of mind, the charitable works are second to none. But ultimately the morals that it has established are the basis for an almost Utopian society. What is evil or offensive in "Thou shalt not kill"? Or love thy neighbor as thy self? Now of course the fact that it goes against current social norms, Thou shall not commit adultery, Thous shall not covet, but look at the problems that these 2 commandments if followed prevent. So why is it a supreme court decision to remove ten very sound, and in my mind common sense ideals from a public place?
It is all part of a plot to erode our morals, this works in numerous ways so that they can further manipulate us in their grand scheme of making us subject to big government. If you think about it, why else would abortion be such a big issue with them? The same reason that Obama gave millions to Philadelphia schools for Trojan Magnum condoms.Well, this is how I view the matter, and since part of job entails telling people to send their quarterback in with his helmet on, I take the higher road and tell them to keep their pants on. But, still I got of the preventive measures training for std's, in that we were told that one of the number one causes of condom failure is using magnum condoms. Because they are too big, they fall off or don't properly provide the barrier seal. Why are we wasting tax dollars on magnum condoms when the regular ones are made of the same elastic material and you can stretch them past your elbow without them breaking? Why are we even encouraging this behavior?
The logic behind this is that it creates illegitimate children. Think about the typical 17 year old boy, he has his entire life ahead of him and he doesn't want to waste his time on a family this early in life. So now you have a mother that must quit school to take care of the child, and what does she do? Collects welfare! What they are doing is creating dependence on the government at an early age. The mother then can't get a job because she has no high school diploma. If a child is raised in that environment, they think it is alright to do the same thing and suckle themselves from Miss Piggy. By allowing this to go on we are creating a never ending cycle. What is next?
"It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God, and the bible."- George Washington
08 June 2010
A Clear Case Of Common Sense Never Prevails In The Federal Gov't
Stereotypically America has fallen under a cloud of I want it now-itis. I myself am just as guilty of this as everyone else, but I have seen the error in my ways and ever so slowly have been working to improve myself. But when you think about it, why is it that we need it now? People spend sleepless nights starring at the ceiling worrying about paying bills, and their credit score. Yet the true question is, in the end does it really matter?
As a kid when I wanted something "now" and didn't have the funds, I had to wait until I had the dough, or lost interest and gave up all together on the endeavor. Am I a lesser man as a result of not having 10 metric tons of plastic guns at my house? No, I believe this has caused me to see the world in a much more realistic light, and I'm quite certain that not getting what I wanted when I wanted it has had no negative effect on my upbringing or current situation. Now the emotional trauma that I have long suffered through, is irreversible and I constantly search eBay for the edible Creepy Crawly kits. (If you seriously believe that, you're dumber than I gave you credit (hehe) for) I also can thank my parents for their participation in what I once thought was a heinous enterprise of depriving me of what every boy should have, because of this I am not one of those sniveling whiners that expect everything in life to be given to them. (Sounds like the Kennedy's and the rest of the liberals) So how does this magical transition into adulthood alter reality? If you don't have the mullah, you don't come home with the 37' TV, that you have to sit in another zip code to watch anyhow. So what do you do? You take a piece of plastic, and use that just so you can impress your father in-law, and buddies, while telling assorted lies.
So for something worth $1,500, you will end up paying another $1,500 in interest over the next 30 years after the stupid thing froze the image of Janet Reno on the LCD screen scaring yourself and costing another $3,000 for therapy sessions for the kids. All just because you couldn't wait to have what would be outdated next month, because everyone else has one now. If you think about it all the interest we pay on useless things like that we could buy a car in cash, maybe even upgrade from a GMC, to a Cadillac. (I had to use GM, since Obama is CEO)
So, by now you are wondering why the sudden change from all the usual political mumbo jumbo, well its connected, and not coming apart any time soon, much like 2 dogs copulating. How can we as a nation expect for our government to balance a budget, and get our nation out of debt, when we ourselves are just as bad? If we as a nation would raise our children by teaching them personal financial responsibility, then our future leaders would be able, and not have an excuse to balance a budget! Take a good peek at our "fearless" leader, I'm willing to bet a large chunk of change that that boy has a large credit card bill, that or he really is trying to ruin our country with a subversive plot.
My second point is that debt is a major contributing factor to the current economic situation. Just like the Mel Gibson movie Maverick, somebody owes somebody else money, and that guy is running short on cash so he hunts up the guy that owes him money so he can pay somebody else, and he doesn't have it. Confused? Take your time I'm here all day. This causes bad blood between all involved parties, and they all get busted kneecaps, or file for bankruptcy. Look at the banks, and Sallie, and Freddie. Now look at this on an international scale, right now as I'm writing this we are at $13,059,330,197,338 in the hole and by the time I'm done with this sentence will be up a couple million more. We owe a substantial portion to China, now what happens when they come knocking on our door to collect? They certainly aren't looking out in our best interests. They are communists for starters, (and posses our nuclear secrets, thank you slick Willie!) That and their death vans, and slaughter of Christians is reason enough alone to not get along with them. But truth be told, we don't say anything because we owe them! So, once again we look toward the history books for what a possible occurrence might be. In 1956 the British, French, and Israeli's seized the Suez canal. President Eisenhower believed that that was against U.S. interests, and threatened to sell U.S. holdings of British currency and bonds. Provided that he did that the pound would've been a most unusual form of toilet paper. Leaving the Brits unable to pay for essential imports. So, what happens now when what we want China doesn't? There have been rumors claiming that Chinese officials claim that they can and would make the U.S. collapse from the inside, and this sounds like how they would do it.
How long can we go on like this? If I was this bad with money I'd be in jail, but then again politicians have been writing bad checks, and drowning people in cars, and everything else for years, why expect them to behave now?
As a kid when I wanted something "now" and didn't have the funds, I had to wait until I had the dough, or lost interest and gave up all together on the endeavor. Am I a lesser man as a result of not having 10 metric tons of plastic guns at my house? No, I believe this has caused me to see the world in a much more realistic light, and I'm quite certain that not getting what I wanted when I wanted it has had no negative effect on my upbringing or current situation. Now the emotional trauma that I have long suffered through, is irreversible and I constantly search eBay for the edible Creepy Crawly kits. (If you seriously believe that, you're dumber than I gave you credit (hehe) for) I also can thank my parents for their participation in what I once thought was a heinous enterprise of depriving me of what every boy should have, because of this I am not one of those sniveling whiners that expect everything in life to be given to them. (Sounds like the Kennedy's and the rest of the liberals) So how does this magical transition into adulthood alter reality? If you don't have the mullah, you don't come home with the 37' TV, that you have to sit in another zip code to watch anyhow. So what do you do? You take a piece of plastic, and use that just so you can impress your father in-law, and buddies, while telling assorted lies.
So for something worth $1,500, you will end up paying another $1,500 in interest over the next 30 years after the stupid thing froze the image of Janet Reno on the LCD screen scaring yourself and costing another $3,000 for therapy sessions for the kids. All just because you couldn't wait to have what would be outdated next month, because everyone else has one now. If you think about it all the interest we pay on useless things like that we could buy a car in cash, maybe even upgrade from a GMC, to a Cadillac. (I had to use GM, since Obama is CEO)
So, by now you are wondering why the sudden change from all the usual political mumbo jumbo, well its connected, and not coming apart any time soon, much like 2 dogs copulating. How can we as a nation expect for our government to balance a budget, and get our nation out of debt, when we ourselves are just as bad? If we as a nation would raise our children by teaching them personal financial responsibility, then our future leaders would be able, and not have an excuse to balance a budget! Take a good peek at our "fearless" leader, I'm willing to bet a large chunk of change that that boy has a large credit card bill, that or he really is trying to ruin our country with a subversive plot.
My second point is that debt is a major contributing factor to the current economic situation. Just like the Mel Gibson movie Maverick, somebody owes somebody else money, and that guy is running short on cash so he hunts up the guy that owes him money so he can pay somebody else, and he doesn't have it. Confused? Take your time I'm here all day. This causes bad blood between all involved parties, and they all get busted kneecaps, or file for bankruptcy. Look at the banks, and Sallie, and Freddie. Now look at this on an international scale, right now as I'm writing this we are at $13,059,330,197,338 in the hole and by the time I'm done with this sentence will be up a couple million more. We owe a substantial portion to China, now what happens when they come knocking on our door to collect? They certainly aren't looking out in our best interests. They are communists for starters, (and posses our nuclear secrets, thank you slick Willie!) That and their death vans, and slaughter of Christians is reason enough alone to not get along with them. But truth be told, we don't say anything because we owe them! So, once again we look toward the history books for what a possible occurrence might be. In 1956 the British, French, and Israeli's seized the Suez canal. President Eisenhower believed that that was against U.S. interests, and threatened to sell U.S. holdings of British currency and bonds. Provided that he did that the pound would've been a most unusual form of toilet paper. Leaving the Brits unable to pay for essential imports. So, what happens now when what we want China doesn't? There have been rumors claiming that Chinese officials claim that they can and would make the U.S. collapse from the inside, and this sounds like how they would do it.
How long can we go on like this? If I was this bad with money I'd be in jail, but then again politicians have been writing bad checks, and drowning people in cars, and everything else for years, why expect them to behave now?
24 May 2010
Police Yourselves
Today I was afforded an opportunity that I have not had in a long time, that being listening to El Rushbo! and Sean Hannity, before Rush there was another program that I was not aware of. The little bit I caught before I switched it to 97.9 "The Bear" they were discussing Venus or now more appropriately, "Moon" Williams choice of attire for the French Open. The host was dead set against what clung to her like a dried booger to a nose hair, that was there under the facade of garments. Some woman called in and said "well that's her free speech." Really? What exactly was she saying? So I looked into the matter myself, and was non the less quite disturbed. To me there are only a handful of things she could be trying to say: look at my cellulite! Another thought that comes to mind is the phrase (I apologize but for lack of a better term) a "moose knuckle". Something else that caught my attention was a story about an Onslow County NC man was arrested on one count of crimes against nature, 2 counts of statutory rape, and two counts of indecent liberty's with a child. He was released on bail. The story was he got the girl to smoke marijuana with girls her age, so that she wouldn't tell her parents and then he had his way with her until a neighbor caught him in the act. By now, you are probably wondering what these two incidents have in common, let me enlighten you.
What we are looking at is a moral denigration of our society, from the injustice of the judicial system to showing off your labia in public. For starters I have no time for people that mess with children, especially the very young. They are our future, and they are innocent by the very definition of the word, and when they are molested and raped that ruins them for life, the psychological effects are quite drastic, and they are never the same again. Studies have shown that sexually abused children have a very high likely hood of being criminals, or mentally deranged. The fact that this got is still on the streets until the courts decide his fate is an unsettling thought. I find it very sad that things like this go on in our "civilized" society, and that they are a constant news item. Years ago that wouldn't have been tolerated.
When my grandparents got satellite TV a few years back my grandmother refused to watch All In the Family, because back when it was first on it was viewed as vile, for language and so on. My dad said to her to watch it, because compared to what is on now it is a clean wholesome family show. He had a good point, today isn't yesterday. I look at cartoons now, and wonder what I'm watching, and what age group its meant for because of some of the material. But this shouldn't surprise you, seeing that Obama's "Safe School Czar"Kevin Jennings, is a militant homosexual that has written a forward for a book called "Queering Elementary Education", a book with chapters entitled: Teaching Queerly: Some Elementary Propositions, Why Discuss Sexuality in Elementary Schools? and Locating a Place for Gay and Lesbian themes in Elementary Reading, Writing, and Talking. To make matters worse his suggested reading list for grammar schoolers has some rather explicit material involving anal sex in bathrooms, old guys and little boys and the like. Years ago freaks like this lived in hiding on the fringes of society or kept their unnatural appetites under their hat because if it was found out they were lynched or run out of town. Yet this type of stuff has gotten mainstream, we allow this. That is even scarier.
Now it seems that there has been a habit of calling women sluts, hoes, whores, or whatever. But when you wear an outfit like "Moon" did it's pretty darn easy to see where this stems from. IF you want people to stop calling you things like "slore" then maybe you shouldn't wear a skirt that stops above the beginning of your butt cheek. Just a thought. Now some of you are probably calling for the government to put a stop to things like the pac man outfit that she wore. Truth be told, that's not what the government is there for, society she put a stop to things like that, but even beyond that the family. The family is the basis for how you turn out, they give you a moral compass. What good is it though when when everyone has a magnet in their pockets? Its hard to raise a good moral child when divorce rates are at fifty percent, and illegitimacy is the social norm. We are failing. Every bit of us is, I'm just as at fault as you are for not doing anything. I feel fortunate to have had parents that raised me the way they did, because of that I knew early on what was right and wrong, instead of gray. Because of that upbringing, I'm in the military, while some of my high school classmates are in jail. People see a need for government intervention because society is immoral and families no longer exist. What was once thought of as moral is being called backward, or old fashioned, as a way to manipulate those that deserve respect.
We need to bring back the god fearing family that once was the foundation of the greatest country known to man. The church and a good family are the building blocks of a good society, and a good person, but society can also kill it. If we did that can you imagine how much better off we'd be? What worked for our forefathers can still work for us, it's not like the turning of the calendar pages render it ineffective. Until we do that we will continue down a long evil path that leads to destruction, pain, and sorrow.
What we are looking at is a moral denigration of our society, from the injustice of the judicial system to showing off your labia in public. For starters I have no time for people that mess with children, especially the very young. They are our future, and they are innocent by the very definition of the word, and when they are molested and raped that ruins them for life, the psychological effects are quite drastic, and they are never the same again. Studies have shown that sexually abused children have a very high likely hood of being criminals, or mentally deranged. The fact that this got is still on the streets until the courts decide his fate is an unsettling thought. I find it very sad that things like this go on in our "civilized" society, and that they are a constant news item. Years ago that wouldn't have been tolerated.
When my grandparents got satellite TV a few years back my grandmother refused to watch All In the Family, because back when it was first on it was viewed as vile, for language and so on. My dad said to her to watch it, because compared to what is on now it is a clean wholesome family show. He had a good point, today isn't yesterday. I look at cartoons now, and wonder what I'm watching, and what age group its meant for because of some of the material. But this shouldn't surprise you, seeing that Obama's "Safe School Czar"Kevin Jennings, is a militant homosexual that has written a forward for a book called "Queering Elementary Education", a book with chapters entitled: Teaching Queerly: Some Elementary Propositions, Why Discuss Sexuality in Elementary Schools? and Locating a Place for Gay and Lesbian themes in Elementary Reading, Writing, and Talking. To make matters worse his suggested reading list for grammar schoolers has some rather explicit material involving anal sex in bathrooms, old guys and little boys and the like. Years ago freaks like this lived in hiding on the fringes of society or kept their unnatural appetites under their hat because if it was found out they were lynched or run out of town. Yet this type of stuff has gotten mainstream, we allow this. That is even scarier.
Now it seems that there has been a habit of calling women sluts, hoes, whores, or whatever. But when you wear an outfit like "Moon" did it's pretty darn easy to see where this stems from. IF you want people to stop calling you things like "slore" then maybe you shouldn't wear a skirt that stops above the beginning of your butt cheek. Just a thought. Now some of you are probably calling for the government to put a stop to things like the pac man outfit that she wore. Truth be told, that's not what the government is there for, society she put a stop to things like that, but even beyond that the family. The family is the basis for how you turn out, they give you a moral compass. What good is it though when when everyone has a magnet in their pockets? Its hard to raise a good moral child when divorce rates are at fifty percent, and illegitimacy is the social norm. We are failing. Every bit of us is, I'm just as at fault as you are for not doing anything. I feel fortunate to have had parents that raised me the way they did, because of that I knew early on what was right and wrong, instead of gray. Because of that upbringing, I'm in the military, while some of my high school classmates are in jail. People see a need for government intervention because society is immoral and families no longer exist. What was once thought of as moral is being called backward, or old fashioned, as a way to manipulate those that deserve respect.
We need to bring back the god fearing family that once was the foundation of the greatest country known to man. The church and a good family are the building blocks of a good society, and a good person, but society can also kill it. If we did that can you imagine how much better off we'd be? What worked for our forefathers can still work for us, it's not like the turning of the calendar pages render it ineffective. Until we do that we will continue down a long evil path that leads to destruction, pain, and sorrow.
18 May 2010
On Stupidity and Swivel Chairs
Somethings seem to be passed down through genetics and through how you were raised. In one of those processes I seem to inherited a hankering to write from my grandfther, be it poems, short stories, whatever. (That might explain what I'm doing now) In one of my grandfathers writings that I read awhile back he thanked the navy for keeping his faher employed during the depression. Forever it seems that the military has always been toted as a guareenteed source of income. People go in and decide to make a career out of it, retire and collect a pension, they do so under the impression that this is inevitable. Not too long ago I was actually kind of glad that I had a guareenteed source of income, unlike those that blew a substancial amount of money on college, only to graduate and not be able to get a job with today's economy. Well now I am not too sure on how lucky myself and the others in my siuation really are.
In all of his brilliance, Obama is cutting the defense budgets and forcing out thousands of people from their jobs within the DoD. Regardless of how many years you have been in, you stand a resonable chance of getting ousted. There is a man in my clinic that is being booted in June after putting in 14 years, he would be up for retirement soon, yet now he will have to start from square one. He has a wife and kids to feed, he does excelliant work, so its not like its his own fault. Does this seem odd to you? It does to me. If you are trying to boost the economy, wouldn't it make sense to try and keep as many jobs as possible? It would seem that this concept has not yet to be comprehended amongst those in Washington. ( I beleive it was Gen Patton that once said "No good decision was ever made from the seat of a swivel chair.")
The logic behind this seems to escape me, probably because I don't speak stupidity. So I tried to come up with resonable reasons for this. They realized the costs of the healthcare bill and want to redirect funds. They are stupid. They ran out of money from spending on bailouts. They want us overran by muslims. They are trying to balance the budget. (Yeah, like they would do that) They want to send a message to the world that America is a land of people that love rainbows, and unicorns and we are going to keep them alive by going green.
The breadth of the scheme is rather large, I myself am currently being screened on if they will let me get new orders in a couple months for my next 2 years, or just give me the boot. With the new influx of jobless vets my question is where will we work? The unemployment rate is already rather high, and if there wasn't jobs before is the job fairy going to pull them from its butt over a fortnight?
While all of this sinks in, I want you to look at that retard with an Obama sticker on their bumper that you pass on your way to work and think that that lousy S.O.B. elected one from their own kind. (And if you're smart run, them off the road so they don't get any wise ideas in Nov.)
In all of his brilliance, Obama is cutting the defense budgets and forcing out thousands of people from their jobs within the DoD. Regardless of how many years you have been in, you stand a resonable chance of getting ousted. There is a man in my clinic that is being booted in June after putting in 14 years, he would be up for retirement soon, yet now he will have to start from square one. He has a wife and kids to feed, he does excelliant work, so its not like its his own fault. Does this seem odd to you? It does to me. If you are trying to boost the economy, wouldn't it make sense to try and keep as many jobs as possible? It would seem that this concept has not yet to be comprehended amongst those in Washington. ( I beleive it was Gen Patton that once said "No good decision was ever made from the seat of a swivel chair.")
The logic behind this seems to escape me, probably because I don't speak stupidity. So I tried to come up with resonable reasons for this. They realized the costs of the healthcare bill and want to redirect funds. They are stupid. They ran out of money from spending on bailouts. They want us overran by muslims. They are trying to balance the budget. (Yeah, like they would do that) They want to send a message to the world that America is a land of people that love rainbows, and unicorns and we are going to keep them alive by going green.
The breadth of the scheme is rather large, I myself am currently being screened on if they will let me get new orders in a couple months for my next 2 years, or just give me the boot. With the new influx of jobless vets my question is where will we work? The unemployment rate is already rather high, and if there wasn't jobs before is the job fairy going to pull them from its butt over a fortnight?
While all of this sinks in, I want you to look at that retard with an Obama sticker on their bumper that you pass on your way to work and think that that lousy S.O.B. elected one from their own kind. (And if you're smart run, them off the road so they don't get any wise ideas in Nov.)
30 April 2010
Doc's Required Reading
This is a list of books I have read of the years and highly recommend to you. I don't get paid for this I just do it, but I am willing to accept compensation for the advertising.This list will be continually updated as I expand my mind. I myself, might not agree with all that is said in them but they are for the most part on point. Some might be older, discussing topics that were current at the time of printing, yet they still ring true, even today. If more people read these books there is no telling how much better off we'd be. Now, without further ado:
Going Rouge : An American Life, Sarah Palin
Godless, Ann Coulter
If Democrat Were Smart They'd be Republicans, Ann Coulter
The Way Things Ought To Be, Rush Limbaugh
See I Told You So, Rush Limbaugh
The Fair Tax Book Neal Boortz
America: The Last Best Hope Vol.1 William J. Bennet
Deliver Us From Evil Sean Hannity
Glenn Beck's Common Sense Glenn Beck
Arguing With Idiots Glenn Beck
Common Sense Thomas Paine
Revolution: A Manifesto Ron Paul
Total Money Makeover Dave Ramsey
Conservative Victory Sean Hannity
Ted, White, and Blue Revised Ted Nugent (This man crawled in through my ear and took my thoughts and wrote a book!) A must read for all those that really, truly, love America, and all that is right with the shining city on a hill.
Going Rouge : An American Life, Sarah Palin
Godless, Ann Coulter
If Democrat Were Smart They'd be Republicans, Ann Coulter
The Way Things Ought To Be, Rush Limbaugh
See I Told You So, Rush Limbaugh
The Fair Tax Book Neal Boortz
America: The Last Best Hope Vol.1 William J. Bennet
Deliver Us From Evil Sean Hannity
Glenn Beck's Common Sense Glenn Beck
Arguing With Idiots Glenn Beck
Common Sense Thomas Paine
Revolution: A Manifesto Ron Paul
Total Money Makeover Dave Ramsey
Conservative Victory Sean Hannity
Ted, White, and Blue Revised Ted Nugent (This man crawled in through my ear and took my thoughts and wrote a book!) A must read for all those that really, truly, love America, and all that is right with the shining city on a hill.
The Truth Be Told!
"I think at a certain point you've made enough money." Who done it? Who said that? Huh? Huh? Don't know? Come on! What are you thinking there are only a couple of people that would say such a thing. Give up? The "messiah", that is exactly who said in it, in an off the cuff remark. I've said it before and so have lots of other folks this guy is a pinko. This is not only a direct attack at the the American dream but also an attack at all that America has ever stood for. Is this not unsettling? I mean come on, this is something straight from an Orwell novel, if you are familiar with Animal Farm (for those that aren't its an allegory on communist Russia) the "change" was subtle, then drastic and scary. The truth is trickling slowly so that those that are slow themselves might have time to see the way things are before it is too late.
So, his magestic holier than thou, how much is too much? Most of you reading this in your inability to see everything in a view that is beyond what you see before you, would say something along the lines of: "Oh that won't effect me, I'm middle class." Bull! This is a prime example of how ignorance is just as dangerous as down right stupidity. It will effect you and drastically, but more on that later. What would seem like enough? 100k? 200k? $1,000,000? Well the empire has $5,000,000 for new clothes. That I am sure puts him in the upper class, if I'm not mistaken. So if he thinks that at a certain point enough money is made then why didn't he give that money to charity, or toward our exponentially growing deficit? (On a side note under a Stalinesque type communism only the people in government would be rich.) Well he needs the money to go on vacation and relax from his high stress job. Really? He makes 400k a year for the rest of his life, and in the mean time the 51% that pay taxes pay for his "vacations", so that a load off hog swallow when you look at the fact that most people are lucky if they bring in $30,000 a year and have only that to live on. So how are you going to determine how much is enough? If it is anything like his sudden urge for health care he will ask for suggestions, and before he can hear a suggestion make up a number.
By now you are wondering how an attitude like this is going to effect you. Good, its about time you pulled your head out of your orifice and listened to reason. The trickle down. No that is not the sound of drool rolling from Janet Reno's haggard face, but how it works. In a nutshell, when the rich spend money everybody profits. Some of you are probably wondering how this makes sense, so here it is barney style:
What do the rich spend their money on? Rich people things of course silly! Like brandy snifters and fancy cars. So the regime decides to put a hefty tax on yachts. Because of course, their narrow little heads can't comprehend the entire repercussions of their ignorance. Now common sense says that the rich didn't get rich by being stupid, so they aren't just going to dish out the extra how ever many bucks to go pretend to be a "seaman", so what are they going to do? Not buy a stinking yacht! This is the part where you come in. If nobodies buying them what are the companies going to do? Start laying off so they can continue making about the same profit. Now how many people go into making just one yacht? Well you have those that assemble, those that cut the trees for the wood, those that harvest the ore, those that take the ore to the refinery, those that make the ore into nails, those that make the paint, those that paint it, those sew the sails, and that annoying guy that gets in your face that tries to sell it too you. Now this list is probably missing a great deal of other people involved. So after people quit buying yachts, the yacht industry goes under, the guys making the paint get laid off, because there isn't a need for that much paint. So if you look at how all off this is connected, it effects more people lower on the totem pole than rich. Now if we reverse this, look at the outcome. There would be a lot of jobs opening because of the demand for yachts, so that makes the rest of that chain increase jobs and profits. So lets look at example where the rich were robbed under the pretense of feeding the poor and the money just sort of, got lost in transit. Cuba, a communist country, a.k.a. a third world, maybe even a fourth or fifth. They tried being pinko and found it wasn't the answer to their problems. Prior to Castro Cuba was the modern day equivalent of the Bahamas, and Vegas all put together, quite a thriving economy. If you have ever read the Old Man and the Sea, you saw a glimpse of what Cuba was before Castro. Now Russia is a different story, they were already in dire straights because of the Great War. So their economy was crap. So what does Lenin do to boost their economy? He institutes capitalism in a plan called: New Economic Policy. When a renowned communist institutes capitalism that should tell you about how well it works. But after they reverted back to communism their economy still was garbage. To have it even close to working means you have to have an amazing economy before you start. So clearly this is not the time for such measures as disrupting capitalism. How will it work when we don't have the jobs?
To demonstrate the lack of intellect this usurper, let us look into what he has done. For starters the health care thing. That should be self explanatory. Placing a 4% surcharge on the rich, while also eliminating the Bush tax cuts. Placing wage ceilings. Messing with financial institution employees. Where does it end? If we continue to not think beyond ourselves we will only screw ourselves. If we don't learn from history we will only continue the never ending cycle of failure.
So, his magestic holier than thou, how much is too much? Most of you reading this in your inability to see everything in a view that is beyond what you see before you, would say something along the lines of: "Oh that won't effect me, I'm middle class." Bull! This is a prime example of how ignorance is just as dangerous as down right stupidity. It will effect you and drastically, but more on that later. What would seem like enough? 100k? 200k? $1,000,000? Well the empire has $5,000,000 for new clothes. That I am sure puts him in the upper class, if I'm not mistaken. So if he thinks that at a certain point enough money is made then why didn't he give that money to charity, or toward our exponentially growing deficit? (On a side note under a Stalinesque type communism only the people in government would be rich.) Well he needs the money to go on vacation and relax from his high stress job. Really? He makes 400k a year for the rest of his life, and in the mean time the 51% that pay taxes pay for his "vacations", so that a load off hog swallow when you look at the fact that most people are lucky if they bring in $30,000 a year and have only that to live on. So how are you going to determine how much is enough? If it is anything like his sudden urge for health care he will ask for suggestions, and before he can hear a suggestion make up a number.
By now you are wondering how an attitude like this is going to effect you. Good, its about time you pulled your head out of your orifice and listened to reason. The trickle down. No that is not the sound of drool rolling from Janet Reno's haggard face, but how it works. In a nutshell, when the rich spend money everybody profits. Some of you are probably wondering how this makes sense, so here it is barney style:
What do the rich spend their money on? Rich people things of course silly! Like brandy snifters and fancy cars. So the regime decides to put a hefty tax on yachts. Because of course, their narrow little heads can't comprehend the entire repercussions of their ignorance. Now common sense says that the rich didn't get rich by being stupid, so they aren't just going to dish out the extra how ever many bucks to go pretend to be a "seaman", so what are they going to do? Not buy a stinking yacht! This is the part where you come in. If nobodies buying them what are the companies going to do? Start laying off so they can continue making about the same profit. Now how many people go into making just one yacht? Well you have those that assemble, those that cut the trees for the wood, those that harvest the ore, those that take the ore to the refinery, those that make the ore into nails, those that make the paint, those that paint it, those sew the sails, and that annoying guy that gets in your face that tries to sell it too you. Now this list is probably missing a great deal of other people involved. So after people quit buying yachts, the yacht industry goes under, the guys making the paint get laid off, because there isn't a need for that much paint. So if you look at how all off this is connected, it effects more people lower on the totem pole than rich. Now if we reverse this, look at the outcome. There would be a lot of jobs opening because of the demand for yachts, so that makes the rest of that chain increase jobs and profits. So lets look at example where the rich were robbed under the pretense of feeding the poor and the money just sort of, got lost in transit. Cuba, a communist country, a.k.a. a third world, maybe even a fourth or fifth. They tried being pinko and found it wasn't the answer to their problems. Prior to Castro Cuba was the modern day equivalent of the Bahamas, and Vegas all put together, quite a thriving economy. If you have ever read the Old Man and the Sea, you saw a glimpse of what Cuba was before Castro. Now Russia is a different story, they were already in dire straights because of the Great War. So their economy was crap. So what does Lenin do to boost their economy? He institutes capitalism in a plan called: New Economic Policy. When a renowned communist institutes capitalism that should tell you about how well it works. But after they reverted back to communism their economy still was garbage. To have it even close to working means you have to have an amazing economy before you start. So clearly this is not the time for such measures as disrupting capitalism. How will it work when we don't have the jobs?
To demonstrate the lack of intellect this usurper, let us look into what he has done. For starters the health care thing. That should be self explanatory. Placing a 4% surcharge on the rich, while also eliminating the Bush tax cuts. Placing wage ceilings. Messing with financial institution employees. Where does it end? If we continue to not think beyond ourselves we will only screw ourselves. If we don't learn from history we will only continue the never ending cycle of failure.
26 April 2010
Hair Pin+ Over Inflation = POP! (The Great Let Down)
I am quite certain that all of us have wanted something for Christmas, birthday or whatever in the worst way; just when you got were let down or disappointed by its cheap construction or the hype that blew it out of proportion. It seems that Americans have once again had it happen to them. This time it wasn't a slinky or dress me up like prince, Barbie, but rather something much more costly: a president.
The current Rasmussen poll says that 42% of the American public strongly disapprove of where this crazy laughingstock is steering our great nation, while 29% approve, and I guess those not mentioned must not have been asked or were too upset to answer coherently. So he has an over all rating of -13. But the current trend from the charts show that more and more people wish they could go back in time and recast their vote. Hmmmmmmm, so much for the "Messiah". Seriously, what did you expect? This is like biting into a doughnut and finding out that it isn't filled with Bavarian cream, but rather a steaming turd, talk about a let down. Unless you expected this from the get go, then how can you possibly feel let down? The "great satan" himself George W. Bush left the White House with an approval rating of -30. Yet there wasn't nearly the open outrage then as there is now. Why is that?
I have greatly failed in keeping up with the goings on in the outside world, I just got back from leave, and WOW! talk about an eye opener. I knew things were bad but not like it really is. I can literally feel the foundation that we were built upon crumbling below my feet. If the founding fathers knew that this was how things would turn out I seriously doubt that would have wasted their time in even trying. If you are any student of history you would understand what I'm talking about. But to get a true understanding you need to read the letters and journals of those that wrote our constitution. If you did that there wouldn't be any arguments on if the militia means that only the military is meant to have the right to have guns. Look at what I mean :All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper. A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. These are all quotes from Thomas Jefferson, the person that supposedly the democratic party stems from. After reading that don't you think he's probably rolled over a couple times this week alone in his grave? That sums up a lot and we didn't need a bunch of tools in the supreme court to tell us what they intended when they wrote the law.
Now look at what Obama's doing, trying to pass laws that would give him power to fire any employee of any financial institution that he thinks is necessary to fire, because he can. If that isn't tyranny I don't know what is. If that's not communism I'm at a loss what else it might be. So why is he doing it? Because he is a pawn in the liberal machines agenda to make America communist, don't believe me? Look at all that they do, taxing the rich 78%, wellfare.They are redisributing the wealth. That is what they have been trying to do for a long time. Why was it that all of the sudden there was a problem with our health care that we were not aware of? They saw an opportunity and seized it. They knew they couldn't do it over night. If you slowly raise the temperature of the burner you can roast a frog alive, and that is what they are doing and now it is coming to the surface. I said it for years but now its being realized. They want you living off of the government, suckling yourselves off the teats of the government. That is how you can be controlled.
I need to stop now that I'm all depressed but it is what it is.
The current Rasmussen poll says that 42% of the American public strongly disapprove of where this crazy laughingstock is steering our great nation, while 29% approve, and I guess those not mentioned must not have been asked or were too upset to answer coherently. So he has an over all rating of -13. But the current trend from the charts show that more and more people wish they could go back in time and recast their vote. Hmmmmmmm, so much for the "Messiah". Seriously, what did you expect? This is like biting into a doughnut and finding out that it isn't filled with Bavarian cream, but rather a steaming turd, talk about a let down. Unless you expected this from the get go, then how can you possibly feel let down? The "great satan" himself George W. Bush left the White House with an approval rating of -30. Yet there wasn't nearly the open outrage then as there is now. Why is that?
I have greatly failed in keeping up with the goings on in the outside world, I just got back from leave, and WOW! talk about an eye opener. I knew things were bad but not like it really is. I can literally feel the foundation that we were built upon crumbling below my feet. If the founding fathers knew that this was how things would turn out I seriously doubt that would have wasted their time in even trying. If you are any student of history you would understand what I'm talking about. But to get a true understanding you need to read the letters and journals of those that wrote our constitution. If you did that there wouldn't be any arguments on if the militia means that only the military is meant to have the right to have guns. Look at what I mean :All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper. A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. These are all quotes from Thomas Jefferson, the person that supposedly the democratic party stems from. After reading that don't you think he's probably rolled over a couple times this week alone in his grave? That sums up a lot and we didn't need a bunch of tools in the supreme court to tell us what they intended when they wrote the law.
Now look at what Obama's doing, trying to pass laws that would give him power to fire any employee of any financial institution that he thinks is necessary to fire, because he can. If that isn't tyranny I don't know what is. If that's not communism I'm at a loss what else it might be. So why is he doing it? Because he is a pawn in the liberal machines agenda to make America communist, don't believe me? Look at all that they do, taxing the rich 78%, wellfare.They are redisributing the wealth. That is what they have been trying to do for a long time. Why was it that all of the sudden there was a problem with our health care that we were not aware of? They saw an opportunity and seized it. They knew they couldn't do it over night. If you slowly raise the temperature of the burner you can roast a frog alive, and that is what they are doing and now it is coming to the surface. I said it for years but now its being realized. They want you living off of the government, suckling yourselves off the teats of the government. That is how you can be controlled.
I need to stop now that I'm all depressed but it is what it is.
30 March 2010
Ranger Up Video Contest
For those of you who are fans of Ranger Up apparel, Ranger Up is hosting a video contest (deadline: 15 Apr). Make a pro-RU video. Two first prizes: $250/$250 credit at RU. Two second prizes: $100/$100 credit at RU. Click the image above to be directed to the RU site.
Bodies of 21 Babies Found Dumped in Chinese River
Bodies of 21 babies have been discovered in plastic bags in a river in eastern China and authorites suspect they were dumped there by local hospitals, state media reported Tuesday.
An initial investigation showed that eight of the 21 babies wore identification tags on their feet tracing them back to Jining Medical College Hospital in Shandong province, the according to the People's Daily Web site. The other 13 were unidentified.
Three of the eight were admitted to the hospital in critical condition, the report said.
South Korea's president ordered the military on alert Tuesday for any moves by rival North Korea after the defense minister said last week's explosion that sank a South Korean ship may have been caused by a North Korean mine.
The blast ripped the 1,200-ton ship apart last Friday night during a routine patrol near Baengnyeong Island near the tense maritime border west of the divided Korean peninsula. Fifty-eight crew members, including the captain, were plucked to safety; 46 are missing, with dim prospects for their survival.
A 53-year-old diver who lost consciousness during the underwater mission to locate the missing crewmen died Tuesday, the Joint Chiefs of Staff said. A second diver was being treated for injuries, officials said.
A prominent southeast Arizona rancher likely was killed by an illegal immigrant, but there's no evidence to suggest there was any confrontation that led to the shooting, authorities said Monday.
The body of Robert Krentz, 58, was located before midnight Saturday on his 35,000-acre ranch about 35 miles northeast of Douglas after his brother reported that he had lost radio contact with Krentz earlier in the day. . . .
Investigators said Krentz apparently came upon one person when he was shot. Krentz was heard telling his brother "illegal alien" on the radio earlier Saturday, and the area of the killing is a known smuggling corridor, according to authorities.
While Krentz was still in his vehicle, mortally wounded, he managed to drive the ATV away from the scene at a high rate of speed before becoming unconscious. The ATV still had its lights on and the engine running when authorities found it.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's hometown of Searchlight, Nev., served as kickoff site Saturday for the latest Tea Party Express tour -- and apparently Reid's supporters weren't too happy about it.
The conservative Tea Party activists were there to protest the policies of Reid and other Democratic leaders, and Reid supporters staged their own protest, with some allegedly throwing eggs at a Tea Party Express bus.
Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart said he witnessed the egg-throwing while speaking with some of the Reid supporters, though a video of the scene is inconclusive.
Breitbart's story was backed up by Levi Russell, a Tea Party Express spokesman.
An initial investigation showed that eight of the 21 babies wore identification tags on their feet tracing them back to Jining Medical College Hospital in Shandong province, the according to the People's Daily Web site. The other 13 were unidentified.
Three of the eight were admitted to the hospital in critical condition, the report said.
South Korea's president ordered the military on alert Tuesday for any moves by rival North Korea after the defense minister said last week's explosion that sank a South Korean ship may have been caused by a North Korean mine.
The blast ripped the 1,200-ton ship apart last Friday night during a routine patrol near Baengnyeong Island near the tense maritime border west of the divided Korean peninsula. Fifty-eight crew members, including the captain, were plucked to safety; 46 are missing, with dim prospects for their survival.
A 53-year-old diver who lost consciousness during the underwater mission to locate the missing crewmen died Tuesday, the Joint Chiefs of Staff said. A second diver was being treated for injuries, officials said.
A prominent southeast Arizona rancher likely was killed by an illegal immigrant, but there's no evidence to suggest there was any confrontation that led to the shooting, authorities said Monday.
The body of Robert Krentz, 58, was located before midnight Saturday on his 35,000-acre ranch about 35 miles northeast of Douglas after his brother reported that he had lost radio contact with Krentz earlier in the day. . . .
Investigators said Krentz apparently came upon one person when he was shot. Krentz was heard telling his brother "illegal alien" on the radio earlier Saturday, and the area of the killing is a known smuggling corridor, according to authorities.
While Krentz was still in his vehicle, mortally wounded, he managed to drive the ATV away from the scene at a high rate of speed before becoming unconscious. The ATV still had its lights on and the engine running when authorities found it.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's hometown of Searchlight, Nev., served as kickoff site Saturday for the latest Tea Party Express tour -- and apparently Reid's supporters weren't too happy about it.
The conservative Tea Party activists were there to protest the policies of Reid and other Democratic leaders, and Reid supporters staged their own protest, with some allegedly throwing eggs at a Tea Party Express bus.
Conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart said he witnessed the egg-throwing while speaking with some of the Reid supporters, though a video of the scene is inconclusive.
Breitbart's story was backed up by Levi Russell, a Tea Party Express spokesman.
22 March 2010
It's A Baby Killer
While I am deeply upset with the passage of the healthcare bill and disappointed in our congressmen for so blatantly ignoring the wishes of their constituents, I am encouraged by the fact that God is in control. He has a plan for this country.
Rep. Randy Neaugebauer, R-Texas, released a statement taking ownership of last night’s “baby killer” comment shouted while Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., was speaking Sunday night. . . .
“Last night was the climax of weeks and months of debate on a health care bill that my constituents fear and do not support. In the heat and emotion of the debate, I exclaimed the phrase ‘it’s a baby killer’ in reference to the agreement reached by the Democratic leadership. While I remain heartbroken over the passage of this bill and the tragic consequences it will have for the unborn, I deeply regret that my actions were mistakenly interpreted as a direct reference to Congressman Stupak himself. “I have apologized to Mr. Stupak and also apologize to my colleagues for the manner in which I expressed my disappointment about the bill. The House Chamber is a place of decorum and respect. The timing and tone of my comment last night was inappropriate.”
If only our congressmen would say what they mean, what they think, more often. The next generation of Americans is being annihilated, and Rep. Neugebauer can't say that the bill is a baby killer. Which, considering the fact that it supports abortion, it is. The inclusion of funded abortions relegates those in support of it to the role of murderers. And yet people at my college can stick posters across campus advertising that "meat's not green" and that we need to save the polar bears.
I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world. -John 16:33
Rep. Randy Neaugebauer, R-Texas, released a statement taking ownership of last night’s “baby killer” comment shouted while Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., was speaking Sunday night. . . .
“Last night was the climax of weeks and months of debate on a health care bill that my constituents fear and do not support. In the heat and emotion of the debate, I exclaimed the phrase ‘it’s a baby killer’ in reference to the agreement reached by the Democratic leadership. While I remain heartbroken over the passage of this bill and the tragic consequences it will have for the unborn, I deeply regret that my actions were mistakenly interpreted as a direct reference to Congressman Stupak himself. “I have apologized to Mr. Stupak and also apologize to my colleagues for the manner in which I expressed my disappointment about the bill. The House Chamber is a place of decorum and respect. The timing and tone of my comment last night was inappropriate.”
If only our congressmen would say what they mean, what they think, more often. The next generation of Americans is being annihilated, and Rep. Neugebauer can't say that the bill is a baby killer. Which, considering the fact that it supports abortion, it is. The inclusion of funded abortions relegates those in support of it to the role of murderers. And yet people at my college can stick posters across campus advertising that "meat's not green" and that we need to save the polar bears.
I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world. -John 16:33
11 March 2010
Perverting The Vision
Imagine with me if you will a day when you don't make decisions for yourself, but a much higher authority does. This includes what you can do, how much exercise you are required based on health records, you have become a mere pawn in the largest game of chess ever played. This is not 1984 or some other Orwellian plot; but the very future of our lives.
Rumor on the street has it that congress is currently discussing a bill that would make it illegal for a cook to put salt in your food at a resturarnt. As absurd as this sounds lawmakers have been doing this type of thing since the dawn of time. There are two main purposes for this: 1 in what Glenn Beck refers to as the nanny state lawmakers try to think for us in what they think is our best interest when really its common sense, such as seat belt laws. Granted they do save lives, but why do we need the government to step in and tell us that we have to do something when it boils down to common sense. I call it survival of the fittest, if you are too stupid for your own good you prevent yourself from contaminating the gene pool. 2 this what congress does to justify their existance. There are only so many things to do, so they make up B.S. problems to create laws to fix them, which never fix the so called problem in the first place, and only create more problems. Look at global warming as a prime example. Remember they fear that if we can no longer justify paying them they will disappear.
Now think of what this means, no pasta. When boiling water to make pasta you add salt. Believe it or not but salt goes into cakes, and cookies too. So they are ruining our diets and restricting our rights. Be it the day when somebody tells me that I can't eat something because they said so. Now here is the big question, when our founding fathers gave established our government they gave it certain powers, so as to prevent tyranny. So how can they legally do this? It clearly states in the tenth amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibitted by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Now I want you to show me in the constitution where it says that they can control what I can eat. IF you can come up with some goofy clause that allows this leave me a comment. What we have a country have allowed this them to go unquestioned. At the same time where does this facillitate socialized medicine? Clearly the American people have forgotten the number of lives given to prevent us from livening under a government that over stepped its bounds. We fought the Brits because we thought the king was a tyrant. Also, the common misconception that the War Between the States, was fought over slavery is wrong. The Emmancipation Proclamation was written after the Battle of Antiemn in 1862. Fort Sumpter the battle that started the war, started on April 12, 1861. Wouldn't it make sense that if that was about slavery that the Proclamation would've been written first? No it boils down to states rights, the south knew that the government was becoming too powerful and they stood up against that. When are we going to say enough is enough? Their power stems from our consent, they are there to benifit us not control us like a gulag. All branches of government continue to allow unconstitutional laws to be passed, as a result all that what our country once stood for is being corrupted and we are loosing our national identity.
Rumor on the street has it that congress is currently discussing a bill that would make it illegal for a cook to put salt in your food at a resturarnt. As absurd as this sounds lawmakers have been doing this type of thing since the dawn of time. There are two main purposes for this: 1 in what Glenn Beck refers to as the nanny state lawmakers try to think for us in what they think is our best interest when really its common sense, such as seat belt laws. Granted they do save lives, but why do we need the government to step in and tell us that we have to do something when it boils down to common sense. I call it survival of the fittest, if you are too stupid for your own good you prevent yourself from contaminating the gene pool. 2 this what congress does to justify their existance. There are only so many things to do, so they make up B.S. problems to create laws to fix them, which never fix the so called problem in the first place, and only create more problems. Look at global warming as a prime example. Remember they fear that if we can no longer justify paying them they will disappear.
Now think of what this means, no pasta. When boiling water to make pasta you add salt. Believe it or not but salt goes into cakes, and cookies too. So they are ruining our diets and restricting our rights. Be it the day when somebody tells me that I can't eat something because they said so. Now here is the big question, when our founding fathers gave established our government they gave it certain powers, so as to prevent tyranny. So how can they legally do this? It clearly states in the tenth amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibitted by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Now I want you to show me in the constitution where it says that they can control what I can eat. IF you can come up with some goofy clause that allows this leave me a comment. What we have a country have allowed this them to go unquestioned. At the same time where does this facillitate socialized medicine? Clearly the American people have forgotten the number of lives given to prevent us from livening under a government that over stepped its bounds. We fought the Brits because we thought the king was a tyrant. Also, the common misconception that the War Between the States, was fought over slavery is wrong. The Emmancipation Proclamation was written after the Battle of Antiemn in 1862. Fort Sumpter the battle that started the war, started on April 12, 1861. Wouldn't it make sense that if that was about slavery that the Proclamation would've been written first? No it boils down to states rights, the south knew that the government was becoming too powerful and they stood up against that. When are we going to say enough is enough? Their power stems from our consent, they are there to benifit us not control us like a gulag. All branches of government continue to allow unconstitutional laws to be passed, as a result all that what our country once stood for is being corrupted and we are loosing our national identity.
07 March 2010
Saudi Jeans
I found this video, and a link to two other commercials from the same campaign, at Saudi Jeans, a blog by a 25-year-old Saudi man. Saudi Jeans focuses primarily on politics, human rights, women's rights and freedoms. I also forwarded this video to my History professor.
Also, this is Mid-Term week for me, and then the following week is Spring Break, so posting will be intermittent on my end.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)