Each writer has free reign over postings. One writer's views are not necessarily the views of all writers.
30 June 2010
The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, at the last resort, to protect themselves from tyranny in government.
- Thomas Jefferson
Ah yes, another post on guns. Well, it's about time for another one and I see that nothing has really changed since the last one. At least, for the better. Just the other day, the supreme court gave their ruling on the 2nd amendment. It just squeaked by. The allegedly unbiased supreme court, whose only purpose in life is to determine whether or not a law is permitted by the constitution, voted on the constitution as being constitutional? Let me rephrase that, the supreme determined that the constitution was legal. I must really be out of it, I never thought that the constitution was up for debate. I was always under the impression that the constitution was untouchable, beyond amending it. You want to hear the best part? The vote was 5-4 in favor of it being legal.
Providing that you own guns, like guns, or couldn't care less, you see that it passed 5-4, that's good it passed. That in and of it self is the problem. Nine people, nine, that all they have to do is read a bill and then read the constitution and give it a go or no go, based on if the constitution permits it. Honestly it sounds like quite an easy job. So if it is clear and concise, and everyone knows it, then how can it only squeeze through by one vote? I'm quite certain that the vast majority of English speaking Americans are aware of the second amendment.
In what is known as the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments, apply to all, and are based on the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. So in 1791, 4 years after the constitution was written, the Bill of rights was ratified, to prevent the infringement of rights that they knew as common sense. The second one of course was to keep and bear arms. The SECOND! not the third, not the tenth. It is second because they believed that only religion and free speech were more important. If they thought that it wasn't that big of a deal, don't you think it would've been an after thought? maybe just got in the bill of rights as the tenth amendment? Instead, the second thought was the great equalizer. There is an old, old saying: God created man, Sam Colt made them equal. The second amendment guarantees us life, and liberty. If you are like me the pursuit of happiness is a loaded gun, but that's neither here nor there. It is through the second amendment that the rest are assured to us.
Now what if this was about a different amendment, lest say, the repeal of the 21st amendment. What then? There would be mobs out for blood, the American people would be outraged. But, well it's only the 2nd amendment, we don't need that. These are the ignorant people that think that Obama's statement about the backwoods people clinging to their guns and religion is because they are Amish backwards and need to step into the 21st century.
Considering how he is idolized today, they probably quit teaching this in schools long ago, but Franklin Roosevelt tried to stack the supreme court in his favor because they ruled voted down numerous of his "New Deal" plans. (Which if you know anything about them it's a wonder that they even made it that far) The Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937 was proposed by Roosevelt so as to allow him basically to do whatever the heck he wanted. This would've allowed him to appoint 6 more justices. This would mean that the court would be in his favor and he could get away with murder. Now why exactly am I bringing this up? Because the supreme court is more corrupt than Chicago on a Friday night. They are supposed to be unbiased and tell it like it is instead of making up a far fledged interpretation of something that is as plain as day, to fit an agenda. That is how something, so simple, so clear, could ever come to pass by one vote under the pretense that it is constitutional because of freed slaves. Yes that was one justices reasoning's as to why it is legal. I don't think that that was the intention of our founders when they wrote that, considering at the time we still had the institution of slavery.
Really this is sad. Where have we gone wrong? In the mean time, I will continue to hold what is dear to me, just as it was to our founders, my religion, and my guns.
24 June 2010
In a nutshell, in 1862 the Mexican army beat the frenchies in a battle. That's what it is. No, seriously that's what it is. I asked a Spanish teacher and anthropologist about it and he told me that it is only really celebrated in the U.S., as opposed to the country of origin. So, are you telling me that we should cheer and speak German to celebrate when Hitler overtook Poland? In essence it is the same thing. Yet, nobody does that here. The alleged truthful reason is that it is to celebrate their heritage, participants claim. Well if you are so happy to be Mexican, why did you come here? That is what I wanna know. If things are that bad that you leave such a miserable place, then why do you celebrate that place? For example, I don't celebrate the day I left Chicago, I want to forget that place and move on with my life, unencumbered by the bad memories from that place. Pardon me while I get depressed... . . . . . . . O.K. I'm back, I got more coffee and I should be good for a bit now. Why of all places to come to, why did you come to the U.S., you could've gone to Guatemala and been rich and you could still share a similar backround. Yet, you chose to come here, now instead of trying to embrace the heritage of your new country, and all that makes it wonderful, you want to dwell on the past, and force your messed up ideals on us?
We constantly see smaller cases of the same disease, the flag of a foreign country hanging from a rear view mirror, or the very common "I can hold my liquor, I'm Irish." Well, ah, are you a dual citizen? Where's your green card? Oh you don't have one, how long have you lived here? Your entire life, then would you be so kind to explain how it is that you are Irish?
I somehow managed to get home for the Fourth of July festivities, my family and myself went to the largest fireworks display in the area, heralded as being one of the top 5 displays in the country. The show synced up with music, and we were close enough to the fancy seating area that we didn't really need the radio,but we had it on anyway, so did almost everybody else. So when they asked everyone to stand for the playing of our National Anthem, there was no possible way that you could not have heard that; unless of course you had both tympanic membranes rupture from a freak accident like digging in your ears with a stiletto. So there I am standing, with my hand over my heart, when right in front of me, is a worthless long haired smelly, hippy type looking guy, that was sitting on his rump, with two girls. I was absolutely livid. I have seen men that have lost a leg, and are on oxygen, put forth the effort to stand up for the playing of our National Anthem. So why exactly can't these three young healthy appearing individuals stand up and show a little respect for the lives that we have lost for that song and our flag? But of course we can blame it on their parents, their childhood, or what have you, but the fact still remains that they sat there talking and groping and so on while the rest of us showed reverence towards this great country. I was on the verge of walking over there and giving him a little, much needed, subtle encouragement to stand up, and then leave him to enjoy the rest of the show in a pool of his own blood as a reminder of what others have sacrificed. But, unfortunately there were children in the truck next to me, and I was sort of restrained after expressing the way things ought to be.
A few days later on the radio, they asked random people why we celebrate the Fourth of July. To me this is a common sense no thinking required answer, as it is, it seems that I am quite wrong on that one. One woman when asked started off as saying that it was to celebrate our independence, then when asked independence from what, she had no clue. So she guessed independence from America. I assume then that we somehow managed to escape from the very cage that we threw ourselves into? What more could you expect then when confronted with the absurdity that she just laughed it off, as you would the notion that Hillary Clinton ISN'T a hermaphrodite. I certainly didn't laugh it off.
What more could expect from a nation whose own fearless leader has on numerous occasions let the flag be carried past him and just stand there with his hands over his crotch? Seriously. Then again this is the same man (if you'd permit me) that campaigned in all the 57 states. The same person that spent a substantial amount of OUR money to travel the world and apologize for you and me. As far as I know, I have done nothing wrong; at least, nothing that I need to apologize for in other countries. But then again, we are successful, and proof that you can have your cake and eat it too, but is that reason to bow to foreign leaders and make a fool of yourself? Does Bill Gates get on TV and say that he's sorry that he is making more money than me? No he doesn't and neither is that expected from him. Does Sarah Brady say that she is sorry for making it such a hassle for me to buy a gun? No. There is no reason to tell the world that we are sorry for being successful, if they followed our lead, then they could achieve the same. If we were so bad that we needed to apologize for ourselves, then how come we have millions sneaking in here every year, along with all of the legal immigrants from all over the world? The reason that you have people coming here is because we are the best. If you don't like that, then I highly encourage you to leave to the country that you believe is better, because that would make us all happy. Why aren't people proud of America, and being American? I don't get it. What is wrong with loving America? This truly is pathetic.
22 June 2010
Operation Wetback II Maybe California wouldn't be in so much debt if they didn't give everything that they payed for to people that never did, and never will contribute into the system. So lets get rid of the parasites in our country. They broke the law, so we are just going to let them get away with it? Get them out of here! They steal jobs from the people that actually pay into the system. The hollow excuse is that they do jobs that we won't do, well when they work for an employer that doesn't pay minimum wage, that might explain why we aren't doing those jobs.
In order for operation Wetback II to be successful we need to secure our border. It is ridiculous for us to think that we are all safe asleep in our beds when we have over 2000 illegals coming across the border everyday. If they can do it, don't you think a terrorist could? or maybe use it as a way to get WMD's across? Just a thought. So I propose that we secure our border by placing two layers of fence with landmines in between them. Of course we must utilize razor ribbon and warning signs to make it obvious that we mean business. To supplement the border patrol National Guard troops will be used to help. Under this new plan, we will shoot on site any armed invaders, and for good measure, tattoo first time offenders with a serial number, and catapult them back over so that the tax payers don't have to pay for a plane ticket. Second time offenders will be sent to Cuba as repayment for the Murial fiasco. This is not "racism" this is law enforcement, if one of your loved ones was murdered and nothing done about it, you would be moaning for justice, and law enforcement, that's all we want; so shut up already. Anyone found to be employing, harboring, and/ or knowingly don't turn in these criminals will be prosecuted. The title: The Border Security Act. I think the title is pretty creative.
This is the only part of this post where this fits. Make English our national language. The current majority of us speak it. If you come here and want to function in society, you must learn to read, write, and speak English. If you want to be a citizen, you must prove proficiency with the English language. By not knowing it you are only limiting yourself, and making others despise you for being lazy and making things difficult for the rest. You left wherever you came from, for the American dream, you can learn blooming English.
The current tax code is thousands upon thousands of pages and growing. We constantly have people claiming that somebody isn't paying their fair share. Because of the complex monster, corrupt politicians use the tax code as a weapon to dispose of their enemies, look at Rush Limbaugh while he lived in New York, he was constantly audited year after year; yet they couldn't find anything but used it just to hassle him. We are burdened and to cover our own behinds have to pay money out of our pockets just to file taxes and make sure it is right and even, then with so many loop holes and random garbage they still might get you. This is ridiculous, so we repeal the 16th amendment, and ratify H.R. 25 S.296. I don't even need to think up a title because it already has one: The Fair Tax Act. With 49% of Americans not paying taxes and that means people like me, (an actual tax payer) are getting SCREWED!!!!!! To make matters worse, you have others that cheat on paying them, this eliminates it. Got questions? Read the book, or visit fairtax.org for details.
Did your parents ever tell you to be careful who your friends were? or wouldn't let you hang around with the "bad apples." Unless you grew up in Mayberry or your nickname was Beaver and you had an older brother named Wally and this never happened to you, either you had bad parents or were in fact yourself a "bad apple." The logic behind this is that their bad habits wear off on you and/or just plain guilt by association. To make my point I'll redirect my fire from a few other directions whilst they others sink in. As a parent, would you take parenting advice from a toddler, a child molester, or a negligent parent? If you were baking a cake, and it wasn't coming out right, would you continue to repeat the whole process in hopes that it would come out right? What happens if you just use hollow threats when it comes to discipline your child? They laugh at you and keep doing whatever it is that they aren't suppose to do. So why do we as a nation continue to participate in similar follies? The above mentioned scenarios happen everyday in a little joint project called the United Nations. In it are despots, tyrants, countries that sponsor terrorism, human rights violators, communists, and socialists. And of course there we are, betwixt all of the earth's scum. They can't run their countries, yet they try to tell us how to run ours? They try to promote peace through sanctions that are a joke and actually send us to wars to support their cause. You don't see France, China, Iran, Cuba and the like sending troops. American tax payers hard earned money goes into something that doesn't benefit them. Did the U.N. help us with Katrina? When has the U.N. done anything for us? If their sanctions actually worked then why do we still have wars? Our founding fathers warned us not to get involved with foreign conglomerates, but of course, who listened? Woodrow Wilson tried to get us involved with the League of Nations, and we didn't because we saw reason. That and it was his idea, and I don't think he had any good ones. Then we got into the U.N. after the second World War. We are a sovereign nation, we are not France, or Cuba, we are America, so why are we having Libya make laws for us? I have a sign on my wall that I look at everyday before I go to work it says "Si Vis Pacem Parabellum" If you wish for peace, prepare for war. With that thought alone we don't need any part of the U.N. Yet we continue to bankroll the farce. So with the Enact National Sovereignty Act we contribute nothing to the U.N., no troops, no funds, yet we remain members so as to observe our enemies.
Grace Commission II In 1982 Ronald Reagan (God Bless you man!) created the Grace Commission to work like tireless bloodhounds. Here are their findings. "We came up with 2,478 separate, distinct, and specific recommendations..... For practical purposes, these savings, if fully implemented, could virtually eliminate the reported deficit by the 1990's versus an alternative deficit of $10.2 trillion in the decade of the 1990's if no action is taken.
"Equally important, the 2,478 cost cutting, revenue enhancing recommendations we have made can be achieved without raising taxes, without weakening America's needed defense build up, and without in any way harming necessary social welfare programs. 'Nuff said!
Yet what I find mind boggling is that congress didn't approve any of this, and there were enough S.O.B.s running around come election day to re-elect this mental degenerates. Thanks dummies.
Through the Harvesting America's Resources Act, we allow drilling much closer to shore for oil, and natural gas. ANWR will be opened to drilling. We must depend on what is ours. We claim to care about the environment, so we don't drill yet we get oil from countries that couldn't care less about it. WHAT!? While doing so funding our enemies. Let's take what is ours, by Allah! Thus creating jobs, boosting the economy and lowering the price of gas. WOW! Truth be told Global Warming, Climate Change, whatever the current politically correct term is in for that at present is just proof that your I.Q. was found in the children's shoe department. Yet, eventually oil will run out, that is a simple truthful fact. So we must still look into other avenues to power America. With that said, as much as I hate to say it, we should look toward France. In 1977 Jimmy Carter whose brain are just peanut shells, made it illegal to recycle nuclear waste. Yet France has been doing so and can run their country for approximately fourteen years on the their waste. The U.S. currently has enough waste saved up that if used could run every American home for twelve years. The resulting amount of nuclear waste that we couldn't use after that is very insignificant. So what are we waiting for? So to top it off we will pass The Declaration of Energy Independence , so that by 2030 we are no longer depending on people that still wipe their butts with their bare hands for energy. No longer are we at their mercy.
The End of Political Corruption Act would first and foremost limit the amount of time that congress serve in office, allowing for a combined total of twelve years of serving in congress. That means two terms in the senate, six in the house, or one term in the senate and three in the house. Our founding fathers never intended for it to be a career, yet its happening. They are so concerned with getting re-elected that they forget about their actual job and waste valuable time trying to get another two or six years to tack on to their past fifty years of wasteful spending. So that they may concentrate on serving us instead of trying to stay in business we put a limit on the time they can be in. The president has to do it,(not in honor of FDR, like they tell you, but rather because he was an oxygen thief and tried to run us into the ground) so why can't they? Thus brings me to my next point, earmark spending, pork barrel, by whatever name it is called, it is only a ploy used by politicians to get re-elected. Why would I in North Cackalacky, want to spend my money on a bridge in Pigs Knuckle Arkansas, that not only I will never use, but only two people will use. In 2006 congress approved $29 billion in earmarks. That's a waste. If it is needed so bad, that is what the state and local governments are for, not the federal. So to reinforce the fact, since they have a couple chances to get re-elected, this bill would prohibit earmark spending. Also, every bill that congress passes, will apply to them, they are supposed to be U.S. citizens too. This means that they pay into social security and such too. Have a nice day Nancy! Also, to prevent the whole you scratch my back I'll scratch yours, all campaign contributions must be sent to a national office were they will be redistributed to the person they are meant to go, without the politician ever knowing who it came from. That'll take the starch from the union's britches.
I could tack a few other of my ideas on, but baby steps will do for now. Once the positive effects of this are shown, we can enact more like closing the Department of Education and giving that back to the states. Slowly but surely, we can take back our country from the liberal, progressive menace that has been plaguing us for years. LONG LIVE RONALD REGAN!
Also I hope you'll join me and Ted Nugent and pray for good bombing weather. Have a nice day!
20 June 2010
There is no utopia, the thought itself is nothing but a pipe dream. You simply cannot achieve the perfection. But in lieu, you can do the next best thing. There is always a downfall in every system, so if common sense always prevailed, you'd choose the one with the least amount of faults. Now why do we even have money in the first place? To use it in exchange for something that we ourselves can't find or make. Now if you had no monetary limit, what would you buy? I'm not saying a happy marriage or something similar. The usual thing would be something like a Ferrari. Well if we were all equal financially speaking, either nobody would have it, or everyone would, which takes most of the fun from it, and is the least likely to occur. This in itself is incentive, if you want something you have to work hard for it. This means that you alone are responsible for your future. If you know that you have nothing to work towards, then you see that as you have no reason to work, and you just collect a wellfare check. Well, what happens when everyone begins to think like that, and nobody works? There would be no money, and nothing would ever get done. But by rewarding hard work, and moving up you make your own lot in life. So if you are a lazy worthless piece of garbage, you will die a lazy, worthless, piece of garbage. But, instead of sitting on your fat, blubbering posterior, you bust your hump day in and day out, never relenting, you stand a good chance of coming out on top. But, to do so, you need to realize, nothing in life is given to you. If it were so, there would be gumdrop mountains, rainbows sprouting out of Al Gore's ears, and Nancy Pelosi would be riding unicorns. The dull dreary thought of everyone being the same, it just sounds boring and repetitive, that cause there to be only one car company, one grocery shop, one TV channel. Dull. Lifeless. Like Janet Reno.
Now, if you made a substantially higher paycheck, would you sit on it, or spend more money? Well the above mentioned police sergeant's story was that Reaganomics doesn't work because the rich are all misers and live in caves on public land, eating roots and berries, while wearing fig leaves, or something like that. Well, to be honest, I for the half see the truth in what he was saying, but really, that just shows he never really thought beyond what he has, and what he wants.
If that were the case, why is there a market for caviar, Cadillacs, fur coats, fancy cigars, expensive wine, yachts, tailored suits, sports cars, and private jets? Now, without the wealthy, there would be no market for these, and millions of lost jobs. Well comrade if you want everyone to have a job you'll have a heck of a job creating more when you redistribute the wealth. So the whole thought that trickle down economics doesn't work is absurd, yet what is even more is Obama's trickle up quote. If you have money you will spend at least some of it, and if you have more, you will spend more. This might not always be the case, but I didn't say it was perfect, just that it was the best. So, by having more funds to spend, they will take that longer vacation, and get the leather seats in the car. Which all of these have more people involved in the process than you might think. Somebody has to raise the cow, somebody kills it, skins it, another tans the hide, somebody else cuts it to size and covers the actual seat. So by that one guy that had a little extra money in his pocket allowed more people to take home more money. That example alone missed numerous other people that profit from the entire ordeal. To top that off, those people that profited from it, get more money to spend on themselves and even more people get involved and exponentially everybody benefits. This is an elementary concept that people for whatever reason can't grasp! Why? It must be the curse of the department of educations meddling. Thanks Jimmy Carter! You were so good to us. (He might a good poster boy for a pro-choice campaign) Then again, common sense wouldn't prevail with the exception of a few.
My last job before coming to lovely Camp Swampy, was making guns for children. (The shame is I didn't make more.) We all liked working there, we could "organize" but we didn't want to. Why, you ask? Because the conditions were great, things were safe, we got paid well, etc. What we always dreaded was a visit from OSHA. Because, for starters, we were all grown adults, and if something wasn't safe, that was our own individual fault. Yet they would come by and say something about somebody not wearing safety glasses while running a CNC lathe that was completely in closed making there no reasonable need to wear glasses, unless it was secretly run by a nuclear reactor and we were bombed by Panamanian socialists. In that case I think safety glasses would be the least of our worries. My point is unions, aren't really needed, at all. For safety we have OSHA, the health department, all these inspectors out the wazoo. So Upton Sinclair can just stay dead, that was then this is now. There are so many regulations that really a union is only good for the "free" picnic. Another thought of mine that I'm just throwing out there for you to chew on is if unions protect the workers, why is there a Union of Union Representatives? That should speak for itself. A substantial number of people are threatened to join, (wait, who's protecting who from who now?) Yet in 60% of the elections to see if the company wants to join a union the vote passes, if they needed protection, don't you think the boss would try to stop them? The fact that they get mandatory pay raises would be in the words of Jackie Gleason "old fashion communism" that gives them no incentive to work harder. Another thought is of mine that I'm just throwing out out there is, if people are paying dues just for their collective bargaining, then how could SEIU ever afford to "contribute" $80 million smackers to candidates in the 2008 election? (Mostly Obama too) Truth is unions are about as crooked as a dogs hind leg, and about as useful as teats on a boar.They are very shady crooks.Read Arguing With Idiots by Glenn Beck, he does a much better job of explaining it than I do.But really, unions don't do anybody except the liberal politicians any good. Look at Chrysler, the union got almost all of the from the bailout package, why? Well if we follow the paper trail, their union paid millions into seeing Obama get elected. Oops! The cat rolled around in its own feces before being let out of the bag!
Unfortunately stupid people still exist, that's why things are how they are. But we can fix most of the problems, and pick up the slack of the Department of Education. Which brings me to my next post, unless something else comes up first. See you then.
16 June 2010
I just received this email and thought I should share, verbatim:
Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them.
This quote came from the . Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.
"The danger to America is not Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president." but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the
"The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
13 June 2010
Oh really? So I broke it down for him. What is one of the most heinous crimes that you go to jail for? Murder, right? So, what about the bands of cannibals that killed and ate WWII pilots in the Pacific? That was their religion, way of life, so what if that happened in America, they would go to jail and rightly so. Statutory rape is another one, in essence almost all laws are based on some form of morality. Like stealing, it happens all the time, and the people that do must think its alright to do it, (otherwise they wouldn't be doing it) so I think its safe to say that you can regulate morality because its been done for years. So with that said where does the moral basis for our American system of morals come from? Now what I'm about to type here is going to raise eyebrows and cause Nancy Pelosi and other assorted liberals to start calling their shrink and protesting naked in the streets. America was founded on Juedo-Christian principles. Now for those that don't know the truth are going to start saying something about the separation of church and state only because you heard someone else say it when they removed the Ten Commandments from the county courthouse. BUT! That's a very big but, (like Rosie O'donnell's) I would love for you to show me where in the constitution it says anything about that. The 1st amendment verbatim is as follows: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. That's it! Where is the separation stuff? Well its not there. All it says in regards to religion is that you can practice whatever you want, (that even allow those freaks in tight britches that cry and worship Satan to do their thing) and that there will be no national religion. Simple. I have read the rest and there ain't squat on it. There is nothing more to read into it. So what is wrong with the Ten Commandments in the courthouse?
A few years back, I was privy to a philosophical conversation, and later read the same belief in a novel, and to be honest I know that it is very true. I have my own personal beliefs on the matter, and regardless if yours differ or not, look at all the good that the christian church has done, besides giving little old ladies comfort and peace of mind, the charitable works are second to none. But ultimately the morals that it has established are the basis for an almost Utopian society. What is evil or offensive in "Thou shalt not kill"? Or love thy neighbor as thy self? Now of course the fact that it goes against current social norms, Thou shall not commit adultery, Thous shall not covet, but look at the problems that these 2 commandments if followed prevent. So why is it a supreme court decision to remove ten very sound, and in my mind common sense ideals from a public place?
It is all part of a plot to erode our morals, this works in numerous ways so that they can further manipulate us in their grand scheme of making us subject to big government. If you think about it, why else would abortion be such a big issue with them? The same reason that Obama gave millions to Philadelphia schools for Trojan Magnum condoms.Well, this is how I view the matter, and since part of job entails telling people to send their quarterback in with his helmet on, I take the higher road and tell them to keep their pants on. But, still I got of the preventive measures training for std's, in that we were told that one of the number one causes of condom failure is using magnum condoms. Because they are too big, they fall off or don't properly provide the barrier seal. Why are we wasting tax dollars on magnum condoms when the regular ones are made of the same elastic material and you can stretch them past your elbow without them breaking? Why are we even encouraging this behavior?
The logic behind this is that it creates illegitimate children. Think about the typical 17 year old boy, he has his entire life ahead of him and he doesn't want to waste his time on a family this early in life. So now you have a mother that must quit school to take care of the child, and what does she do? Collects welfare! What they are doing is creating dependence on the government at an early age. The mother then can't get a job because she has no high school diploma. If a child is raised in that environment, they think it is alright to do the same thing and suckle themselves from Miss Piggy. By allowing this to go on we are creating a never ending cycle. What is next?
"It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God, and the bible."- George Washington
08 June 2010
As a kid when I wanted something "now" and didn't have the funds, I had to wait until I had the dough, or lost interest and gave up all together on the endeavor. Am I a lesser man as a result of not having 10 metric tons of plastic guns at my house? No, I believe this has caused me to see the world in a much more realistic light, and I'm quite certain that not getting what I wanted when I wanted it has had no negative effect on my upbringing or current situation. Now the emotional trauma that I have long suffered through, is irreversible and I constantly search eBay for the edible Creepy Crawly kits. (If you seriously believe that, you're dumber than I gave you credit (hehe) for) I also can thank my parents for their participation in what I once thought was a heinous enterprise of depriving me of what every boy should have, because of this I am not one of those sniveling whiners that expect everything in life to be given to them. (Sounds like the Kennedy's and the rest of the liberals) So how does this magical transition into adulthood alter reality? If you don't have the mullah, you don't come home with the 37' TV, that you have to sit in another zip code to watch anyhow. So what do you do? You take a piece of plastic, and use that just so you can impress your father in-law, and buddies, while telling assorted lies.
So for something worth $1,500, you will end up paying another $1,500 in interest over the next 30 years after the stupid thing froze the image of Janet Reno on the LCD screen scaring yourself and costing another $3,000 for therapy sessions for the kids. All just because you couldn't wait to have what would be outdated next month, because everyone else has one now. If you think about it all the interest we pay on useless things like that we could buy a car in cash, maybe even upgrade from a GMC, to a Cadillac. (I had to use GM, since Obama is CEO)
So, by now you are wondering why the sudden change from all the usual political mumbo jumbo, well its connected, and not coming apart any time soon, much like 2 dogs copulating. How can we as a nation expect for our government to balance a budget, and get our nation out of debt, when we ourselves are just as bad? If we as a nation would raise our children by teaching them personal financial responsibility, then our future leaders would be able, and not have an excuse to balance a budget! Take a good peek at our "fearless" leader, I'm willing to bet a large chunk of change that that boy has a large credit card bill, that or he really is trying to ruin our country with a subversive plot.
My second point is that debt is a major contributing factor to the current economic situation. Just like the Mel Gibson movie Maverick, somebody owes somebody else money, and that guy is running short on cash so he hunts up the guy that owes him money so he can pay somebody else, and he doesn't have it. Confused? Take your time I'm here all day. This causes bad blood between all involved parties, and they all get busted kneecaps, or file for bankruptcy. Look at the banks, and Sallie, and Freddie. Now look at this on an international scale, right now as I'm writing this we are at $13,059,330,197,338 in the hole and by the time I'm done with this sentence will be up a couple million more. We owe a substantial portion to China, now what happens when they come knocking on our door to collect? They certainly aren't looking out in our best interests. They are communists for starters, (and posses our nuclear secrets, thank you slick Willie!) That and their death vans, and slaughter of Christians is reason enough alone to not get along with them. But truth be told, we don't say anything because we owe them! So, once again we look toward the history books for what a possible occurrence might be. In 1956 the British, French, and Israeli's seized the Suez canal. President Eisenhower believed that that was against U.S. interests, and threatened to sell U.S. holdings of British currency and bonds. Provided that he did that the pound would've been a most unusual form of toilet paper. Leaving the Brits unable to pay for essential imports. So, what happens now when what we want China doesn't? There have been rumors claiming that Chinese officials claim that they can and would make the U.S. collapse from the inside, and this sounds like how they would do it.
How long can we go on like this? If I was this bad with money I'd be in jail, but then again politicians have been writing bad checks, and drowning people in cars, and everything else for years, why expect them to behave now?